EagerEyes Shorts

Musings on visualization, photography, programming, etc. that are too long for Twitter but too short for (or don't fit) my visualization website, EagerEyes.org. Part of my vanity website, kosara.net, which is most notable for hosting my list of publications. If you still want to know more, see my university page at UNC Charlotte, and/or follow me on Twitter.

marco:

Amazon to Release Ad-Subsidized Kindle for $114

Bizarre:

Ads will appear on the device’s screen saver and show up as a banner on the homepage, but will not appear inside books.

It’s only a $25 savings from the normally-$139 Kindle 3. I’m sure they can find buyers for it, but at what cost to Amazon’s (and the Kindle’s) image?

I don’t think this is about ads: it’s about lowering the initial cost and making people pay the balance later. If anything, the ads only pay for the interest on the owed money.

I doubt Amazon will make serious money on these ads. They’re mostly there to annoy you into paying the $25 to remove them. And that’s why the difference is such a small (and “nice”) number: it’s small enough for somebody to just pay it at some later point. Lowering the price to $99 would make the later payment $40, which looks like a lot more, and is almost half the original price; so it appears to be a lot more.

That is also the reason why Amazon won’t give the Kindle away for free (like a lot of people have suggested): they don’t want the ads, they want people to buy it so they can pay the difference later. Nobody will pay $139 to remove ads from a free Kindle.

Posted at 8:19am and tagged with: kindle,.

  1. keitaroh reblogged this from marco and added:
    I wouldn’t justify a $25 savings with having advertisements for the life of the device - if it was $50 less than the...
  2. multisonic reblogged this from marco
  3. peterwknox reblogged this from marco and added:
    This makes the $139 version the ad-free premium version. How many ads and ad supported websites do we already consume?...
  4. eagereyes reblogged this from marco and added:
    I don’t think this is about ads: it’s about lowering the initial cost and making people pay the balance later. If...
  5. charmian reblogged this from marco and added:
    Agreed. This is such a paltry discount. If it were like fifty dollars, now maybe it would be more exciting.
  6. michaelk42 reblogged this from huberthumphreydeathrally and added:
    Weirdly, ads in (paperback) books at least used to happen, so technically this isn’t that new an idea. That was the...
  7. zeb reblogged this from mikehudack
  8. picoworld reblogged this from marco and added:
    I can’t see why this will diminish the Kindle’s image. To be honest, I don’t know how many people would actually go for...
  9. lifeofachampion reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    I agree 100%. Just tonight I was chatting with my friend about how whole textbooks and class material will be on a...
  10. brunabenvegnu reblogged this from marco and added:
    vai ser a oferta kindle da compra coletiva. O poupar pelo poupar. Se é subsidiado devia ser de graça.
  11. jryu reblogged this from mikehudack
  12. mikehudack reblogged this from marco and added:
    This isn’t bizarre. And it won’t harm their image. This is the first step towards giving the device away for free. One...
  13. ckck said: A $25 saving in cold hard cash, but you end up paying far more in terms of ad exposure, not to mention it’ll have zero resale value.
  14. kevinmosley said: lame. major ew
  15. andrewnonumbers said: The idea of having banner ads on a device not usually connected to the internet is interesting to me.
  16. justinluey reblogged this from marco and added:
    This is an interesting move, but the pricing is ridiculous. Why isn’t it free? Will people really opt into ads to save...
  17. marco posted this

Notes: